MAPS & TERMS |
A N e w E n e m yS e t t i n gS e t t i n gS e t t i n gBackground |
||||
photo caption |
![]() ![]() The spring of 1942 saw a continuation of the string of Allied defeats inflicted by the Japanese since December, 1941. Allied military power was being shattered in the Pacific and Asia as the Japanese initiated military conquests and raids in their quest for empire. In its efficiency and speed Japanese military prowess was shocking its opponents and inflicting defeats by land, sea and air. The British colonies of Hong Kong, Malaya and the important base at Singapore had fallen. American & Australian forces were suffering defeats in the Philippines and across the Pacific, their naval and air power badly damaged. These victories were designed to reduce any vulnerability to the use of the main prize of the Dutch East Indies and British Borneo with their rich economic resources. The Japanese advance into Burma was part of this strategy. Specifically the invasion of Burma was to secure the flank for the conquest of Malaya. And it was also designed to cut the only Allied ground supply link to Nationalist China that ran through Burmese territory into China. Once this all-weather supply route known as the Burma Road was cut, it was believed Chinese resistance would weaken. Beginning in January of 1942, throughout that spring the Japanese began to soundly inflict defeats upon a numerically superior force of British and American-led Chinese. The Allies were beaten by a more aggressive and tactically proficient army. The Japanese military skill was underestimated, their battlefield courage, speed, and stamina coming as a surprise. The British were hobbled by a lack of sufficient training and equipment, and the Chinese forces provided to be ineptly and often criminally led. Most of the lowland Burmese (the majority in the nation of 17 million) welcomed the defeat of the British colonialists. They deserted from British-led army units, and some actively co-operated with Japanese forces. The exception was the minority population in the north and east, the hill tribes of the Karen, Shan, Kachin, and Naga (which would remain mostly loyal to the Allies during the war). Rangoon was abandoned in March, and by the end of May Burma had fallen to the Japanese. |
||||
photo caption |
|
||||
|
The Prize Burma beckoned with reasons to the Allies to return, ensuring it would remain a battleground. To the British, Burma was a Japanese base to threaten India with either a military invasion or to ferment internal dissent. Re-taking it meant ending the threat to India. And there was another important reason. To overcome the sense of disgrace at being soundly defeated and kicked out of her Asian colonies, and to ally concerns over holding together the British Empire in the future, Burma demanded to be re-conquered. Casting their eyes on their priced lost jewel of Singapore, Burma in British hands meant a springboard for the re-conquest of her lost Asian colonies. Some high officials and commanders believed it was through conquest of southern Burma with amphibious assaults that this could occur (which is why in the fall of 1943, an Admiral, Lord Mountbatten, was appointed theater commander), and not through the northern jungles with its inadequate logistical network. British commanders were also under pressure from the Americans and Prime Minister Churchill for positive results. Always pushing for offensive action from his field commanders, knowing Britain was dependent upon American aid fueled Churchill's desire to demonstrate that Britain should and would not be eclipsed in the war effort. |
||||
photo caption |
To the Nationalist Chinese government the re-conquest of Burma meant a strengthening of its rule. The Nationalist regime under Chaing Kai-Shek was more interested in consolidating its power and building up its forces than in fighting the Japanese and risking loyal troops and equipment. Its focus was on preserving strength for future battles in the long-running Chinese Civil War against the growing Communist forces. Demonstrating token action against the Japanese meant the ability to maintain the flow of foreign supplies, complemented by bluffing to threaten to withdraw from the war. The Americans were trying with much frustration to get the Nationalist forces to reform and respond to American military advisors and ideas. To Chaing Kai-Shek, American reforms and control over military operations meant a weakening of loyalty to his regime and the growth of potential threats to him. Together, all this translated into Chinese inertia, corruption and opposition to fighting. |
||||
photo caption |
It was these concerns and conflicting desires which were to mold Allied strategy and shape Wingate's missions. Considering their goals the Allies in the India-Burma Theater in 1942 and into 1943 were short of many things. This included troops, equipment, and a sufficient logistic base. The theater ranked at the bottom of supply priorities, made more difficult by the long supply line (2 months by sea from the U.S. to India). After their defeat the British needed time rebuilding & re-equipping the Allied forces in India as well as building up logistics and communications. There was civil unrest in India diverting troops. The Indian Army, with many of its best units fighting in the Middle East or already captured in Singapore, needed to undergo rebuilding. Just as importantly, morale and confidence of the British and Indian forces needed to be completely rebuilt. Disappointed at the string of defeats, Winston Churchill wrote, "going into swampy jungles to fight Japanese is like going into the water to fight a shark."2 The British Indian military command was in shock from the scale of the defeat & was slipping into a passive, defensive mentality.
|
||||
|
|||||
1. Louis Allen, Burma, The Longest War
(New York: St. Martin's Press, 1984), 120. |